The
Science Behind It
Improving Your
Health
Patients frequently
ask me, "How does this stuff work?" There is a
natural curiosity in a world where science has
dominated for centuries. I encourage you to read on
with a healthy skepticism, and if so inclined obtain
the studies mentioned and continue to learn how
science is catching up to the potent pellets of
homeopathy.
In 1833 disease was
still thought of in many conventional medical
circles as an imbalance between humors of the body:
yellow and black bile, phlegm, and blood. The
therapeutic agents of choice even during the era of
"hospital medicine" in France were leeches for
bloodletting. Forty million leeches were imported
that year for bloodletting; the health of the
average person went unchanged.
However, what and
whose science does we count on for accurate and
reliable information? Samuel Hahnemann based his
medicine on observable or empirical studies of his
patients, not the so-called science of the day that
would later prove it to be unsubstantiated fanciful
theories without medical merit.
During the nineteenth
century, physicians and scientists continually were
in conflict over the causes of disease and the most
appropriate way to treat it. It’s no wonder that
homeopathy came under heavy criticism despite its
undeniable clinical effects. The basic sciences of
biology, anatomy, chemistry, and physics were in
their infancy. It is only recently that a growing
body of scientific evidence has mounted to begin
explaining and even to prove the theories that
homeopathy have witnessed in their patients for the
last 200 years.
The Cluster Theory
One of the
challenging aspects of homeopathic theory has been
that continual diluting and adding kinetic energy
(the energy of motion) through shaking of medicines
has a viable effect on the solution that is created.
Dr. Shui-Yin Lo, senior research scientist with
American Technologies Group of Los Angeles and
visiting associate professor in chemistry at the
California Institute of Technology, presented
breakthrough research in 1997 at the Homeopathic
Research Network meeting held in San Francisco.
Dr. Lo’s research
found that when a solution is diluted, placed in
water, and shaken, as in homeopathic preparations,
the water surrounding the solution begins to harden
and form crystals or even ice at room temperature.
He found the "IE clusters" (I for "ice" and e for
"formed through electromagnetic forces rather than
by temperature") of water measured by quantum
electrodynamics’ calculations were not formed by
simple dilution or shaking alone. Only the
combination of these two actions, which are similar
processes in which homeopathic medicines are
prepared, yielded the unique cluster formations. Dr.
Lo went on to find that if the solution is further
diluted and vigorously shaken, the concentration of
the solid water clusters increases.
The "electromotive
force" of water can be measured by putting two
identical stainless steel electrodes in water and
measuring the potential. Normal water shows no
potential, while IE water shows an electromotive
force.
Dr. Lo went on to say
that if the solution is further diluted and
vigorously shaken, the concentration of the solid
water clusters increases.
For the last two
centuries homeopaths have argued that each remedy
has a unique action and effect on our body. Dr. Lo
has been able to prove that the original substance
that was put into chemical solution determines the
unique shape of the concentration. This is one of
the first studies that I am aware of that
demonstrates the validity of many of the homeopathic
principles that have governed its practice during
the last 200 years.
In 1997 the
Homeopathic Medicine Research Group established by
Directorate Commission XII E of the European Union
Commission published a comprehensive report on a
two-year study of homeopathic research. They
concluded there was sufficient evidence of
effectiveness to continue to develop more research
into homeopathy.
More research will
certainly be coming from Dr. Lo, but if seeing is
believing, then we’ve all got the first glimpses of
what may prove many of the homeopathic theories of
how a remedy can be diluted and still be active.
Homeopathic Human
Studies
Homeopathic remedies
are first tested on humans during a rigorous
analysis called proving The last two decades have
seen an increased interest in homeopathic research
due to its nontoxic, cost-effective potential. The
British Medical Journal 302 dated February 9, 1991,
included a review of 25 years of clinical research
on homeopathy. As Dana Ullman points out in
Homeopathic Medicine for Children and Infants
(Ullman 1992), of the 107 controlled clinical
trials, 81 showed successful results from
homeopathic medicines, which suggests promising
possibilities for treatment.
Ninety women in their
last month of pregnancy were given a combination
remedy of five homeopathic medicines. The women
given this mixture spent 40 percent less time in
labor and had a 25 percent reduction in
complications during birth as compared to the women
given a placebo (Ullman 1992).
Homeopathic medicines
treat a variety of complaints as shown by the
collection of research outlined in Dr. Bill Gray’s
recent publication, Homeopathy: Science or Myth? Dr.
Gray’s review includes a study on acute pediatric
diarrhea in Nicaragua by Jennifer Jacobs, M.D., and
M.P.H. The story was published in Pediatrics, 1994;
93; 719-725 and shows dramatic reduction of symptoms
well beyond random chance. The test protocols gave
patients an individualized selected homeopathic
remedy, and the results were qualified to meet
conventional scientific standards.
I’ve given you a
brief introduction to an expanding body of
homeopathic research that will reassure the many
individuals and families that rely on homeopathic
care.
|